The pie charts show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The four pie charts give information about the amount of electricity generated using five different sources of fuel in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that coal is the most common resource in Australia, while nuclear power was the main source in France.
In 1980, half the amount of coal was produced in Australia more than in France, while twice as much oil French spent as Australians on generating electricity. France consumed more nuclear power than Australia, at 25 units and 20 units respectively. Hydropower was used to produce electricity in France more than in Australia.
In the last period, coal accounted for one-fourth of the total energy used to produce electricity in Australia on the chart. Natural gas, hydropower in France, and oil, natural gas in Australia had the same pattern, at only 2%. Australians did not exploit nuclear power, but it was the highest unit on France's chart. 36% was the amount of hydropower in Australia in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 76
- The increase of production of consumer goods damages the natural environment Why is this the case What can be done to reduce it 84
- The bar chart shows the number of people working in four sports sectors in an Australian town in 2016 10
- 30 1 16 Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problems of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education To what extent do yo agree or disagree 61
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98795180723 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73047775712 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572289156627 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5246378299 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35275330306 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155733654643 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108808931551 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230163043816 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128671782583 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.