Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leaders are the ones with clear vision for their people. There are many characteristics which define a leader. Qualities such as integrity, ambition, determination, sound judgement are often believed to be possessed by a leader. Many leaders are revered for their incisive mind, their ability to drive a nation out of trying circumstances. However, one of the most important aspects which should be embodied in an ideal leader is that of commanding respect of its contemporaries along with its followers.
History is replete with examples where a leader who has a good standing among its peers has lead a nation to progress. One of the first few names that come to mind is of Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru, who served as the first Prime Minister of the independent India. He maintained commendable rapport with his peers, which is one of the reasons that people believed in him and joined him at the times of building the nation. He enjoyed the support of his adversaries, who believed that he always acted in the interests of the nation. One such instance is when he started non-alignment movement, which was joined by many young nations of the time. It gave the message that India could make its own path when the world was divided to show support to the two world powers that were a result of the World War II.
Another great political figure, highly regarded by many, is the former President of United States of America, Mr. Abraham Lincoln. He is credited with putting an end to the civil war of the 19th century which existed in the USA at the time. He fought for the rights of the native African American community and freed them from ages of slavery. Martin Luther King Jr. was also a great leader who enjoyed respect among his peers and worked against the racism in the USA.
It may however be noted that the above personalities have commanded respect from people beyond races, strata and been on the right side of morality. There are a few leaders who may have dubious moral judgement, such as Adolf Hitler, but still enjoyed support of their peers. Nonetheless, history has credited these leaders as tyrants, and they have lead the nations on the wrong path.
Given the above arguments, I believe a leader can make an indelible mark in the hearts of his people when he is respected by one and all. Also, it seems to be no doubt that respect follows a leader who is morally right and leads his people on the path of development.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 83
- Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe 55
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 83
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, nonetheless, so, still, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70560747664 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53429184678 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3197810726 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.7 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241511871422 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734612191169 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061275092537 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142391251311 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765795621383 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.