Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework or projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?
Practical examinations can be considered the utmost effective method to evaluate the conduct of scholars in learning institutes. However, constant assessments such as coursework or projects are not the best way to examine how students perform in the subjects. It is agreed that official papers are the means of appraising pupils' performance. This essay will analyze why holding an exam is beneficial to assess each student and why teachers should not rely on regular exams to mark the final grades.
To begin with, it is certain that, an exam is held in the presence of teachers; as a result, they will do it by themselves and there is nobody cheat someone's effort. During the time students sit for an exam, they will be thoroughly observed by school supervisors; consequently, they try all their effort into the test without copying others' work. Moreover, through school papers, it can be assured that those who are deserving students will receive good marks and outrank others. Therefore, official assessment in class can help professors evaluate the actual act of a student.
On the contrary, having students take an exam cannot give an obvious picture of their academic achievement to their trainers and also their parents. For example, in a university or college, undergraduates can use someone's project test and teachers fail to assess the real accomplishment of their disciples. Sadly, plagiarism can lead students to the one who does not actively acquire knowledge then access their later life adversely due to the lack of knowledge and experience. Hence, regular tests cannot be an appropriate way to examine a student's real ability.
In conclusion, formal assessments are a certainly lucrative and effective way to appraise students' probability of studying. Nevertheless, getting constant examinations such as coursework or projects is not the best way for teachers to depend on and give their pupils the final marks.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school 84
- tu
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional culture are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view It is a contentious argument that ancient civilizations will be put a 89
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework or projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their door to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourists outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 413, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...apers, it can be assured that those who are deserving students will receive good marks and ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...cannot be an appropriate way to examine a students real ability. In conclusion, formal as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23548387097 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9012627772 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570967741935 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3262027202 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267958344075 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101121826632 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100421545888 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186517585572 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101461035534 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.