When choosing a job, salary is the most important decision. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One school of thought holds that remuneration is the most imperative factor when selecting a job. While I accept that this perception is somewhat justifiable, I believe that other aspects should also be considered by applicants.
On the one hand, It is understandable that a lucrative salary is indispensable for job hunters. Firstly, a well-paid occupation could be an undertaking for a good living standard. It can be perfectly explained by the fact that as the gain of various costs of living such as accommodation, food, and bills, a competitive stipend could allow employees to be able to live a free-worry life, which could help them lead to optimistic mental health. Secondly, better working productivity could be enhanced by a lucrative wage. For instance, by paying a higher pay-check level, numerous employers in Vietnamese establishments have witnessed a considerable enhancement in the worker's enthusiasm and responsibility, which could lead to an improvement in their performance at work.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convinced that there are other alternatives that are equally vital when making a job decision. One reason is that passion plays a significant role for job seekers in their chosen occupations. To be more specific, the more ardor officials spend on their job, the more dedication and devotion to their attainment are performed, leading to more promotion opportunities for their career ladder. Another reason is that the working environment also appreciably affects the choice of applicants. For example, it can be seen that when working with supportive colleagues and trustworthy managers, white-collar workers could be recognized and encouraged, resulting in most of them tending to be more creative and enterprising. As a consequence, their staying rates with the company could increase significantly.
In conclusion, while it is irrefutable that salary is one of the most critical candidate's decisions, I would contend that the other factors should also be widely regarded when selecting a job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is the case What can be done to attract local people 78
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- When choosing a job salary is the most important decision To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 668, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...essed a considerable enhancement in the workers enthusiasm and responsibility, which co...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...t work. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convince...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37846153846 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26082140158 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550769230769 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9071943435 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0974369325104 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04108668866 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518048427974 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812735141759 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417245649038 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.