Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow
students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or
supervisors.
Some people think humans learn more from their teachers or person at a higher level than the person at the same level, as they have better experience and knowledge about how things work. However, I disagree with this stance for the following two reasons.
First of all, People from the same level often see things from similar viewpoints, and they can understand our queries, and doubt better than someone from a higher level than us. For instance, During my university days, I usually had trouble understanding concepts taught in our classes by teachers who had mastered the course and achieved a lot in a similar field. However, when the same course was taught by my friends, who were familiar with my knowledge level and learning style, I used to comprehend the topic very easily. If I hadn’t learned the content of my academic curriculum from my friends then I’m almost sure that my grades would have been way lower than it is right now. When people know the level or understand people better, they can simply modify the knowledge to be passed into a similar form that can be easy to grasp. This way of learning can be very effective and can save a lot of time.
Second of all, People of the same level can help us to communicate as they won’t judge the questions that we raise to them whereas this mightn’t be the case when we question our seniors or teachers. For instance, When I was learning to ride a car as I knew nothing at the beginning, I would just consult with other fellow learners like me rather than question my driving teacher. By consulting my friends I was able to get answers to my doubts and soon that paid off and I learned to drive the car faster. If I had depended only on my teacher for learning to drive a car, I doubt I would have learned to drive that quicker. Good communication can prevent various problems before they occur, but not enough communication can worsen things. By avoiding hassles at learning we simply learn things faster and never feel like we are lost.
In conclusion, I do believe we tend to learn things better when we learn from someone who can understand us better and help us deal with problems in our way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-20 | Alana Gerber | 88 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | villian7 | 68 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-11 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | Louissun | 70 | view |
- It was easier in past to find a job 73
- Smart Cars 75
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been pr 16
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth 70
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'had' and 'trouble'.
Suggestion: had usually trouble
... instance, During my university days, I usually had trouble understanding concepts taught in our cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57692307692 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42871410473 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494871794872 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6679999787 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259214168643 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960107666737 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089995147282 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196889583903 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881166835856 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.