The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture describes how carbonated drinks are generated.
Overall, the process comprises a number of stages, beginning with filtering raw water and ending with packaging and delivering products to supermarkets.
At the beginning of the process, water is cleaned carefully through some stages. Raw water from factories is filtered, after which this amount of water is sent through a process which incorporates water softener and chemical substances to ensure that the water is clean enough to make drinks. After being prepared, the water is pumped before the stage of heating evaporation and carbonation starts. The water now is heated by an electric heater to be steamed, and then it is cooled to decrease the temperature. Once the temperature is appropriate, the steam is transmitted into a tank to carbonate water.
After being carbonated, the water follows a pipe to the mixing tank, where the mixture of water and substances such as coloring, syrup and flavor to make the water more attractive and tasty. Then, again, the water is filtered and poured into cans and bottles before being packed into paper boxes. Once the drinks are ready to use, they will be transported in trucks to supermarkets for consumers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 67
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 73
- The table below shows population figures for 4 countries for 2003 and projected figures for 2025 and 2050 67
- The diagram below shows the process of making carbonated drinks Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1608040201 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76245740782 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.422461404 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0900791540962 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410936816143 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286041290323 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633796241005 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244885881779 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1608040201 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76245740782 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.422461404 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0900791540962 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410936816143 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286041290323 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633796241005 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244885881779 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.