Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas. Why? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
It is true that nowadays, youngsters tend to avoid pursuing their careers in the countryside with farming jobs. While this tendency can be attributed to several reasons, I would argue that it is necessary to raise interest among young people to involve in farming work.
There are numerous factors that contribute to the occupational shift from agronomical to other modern occupations. In terms of leading-edge technology, industrial development has led to the introduction of several advanced techniques for harvest. As a result, conventional agricultural works, in which farmers have to nourish their crops manually, have increasingly fallen by the wayside. From the employment perspective, the gradual disappearance of labor-intensive occupations in the suburbs has also resulted in the lack of well-paid jobs. Thus, the mass exodus of young people from rural areas to city centers is inevitable, in which several sedentary jobs are expected to be a promising selection for them to move up to career ladders.
However, I firmly believe that young people should be encouraged to opt for farming work, which can be ascribed to several reasons. Firstly, despite many beneficial results, manipulation of modern technology can also pose numerous negative consequences for the environment stemming from the release of contaminants or the requirement for more energy consumption. Thus, the participation of farmers is still of paramount importance for the crops. Secondly, due to the excessive migration to urban areas, several young people find difficulty in finding jobs. Moreover, living independently in a concrete jungle can also cause a sense of alienation due to the lack of family gatherings, in which young people tend to lose their confidence in gaining a competitive edge among other employees. Finally, in order to mitigate the ecological crisis, young students ought to be stimulated to involve in agronomical or ecological studies. By applying their academic knowledge, students will have opportunities to contribute to sustainable farming, which plays a crucial role in the development of food industries.
In conclusion, although the use of technology can effectively industrialize agriculture, I believe that sustainable development is impossible without the hand of humans. Thus, young people still need to be encouraged to participate in agricultural studies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Task 2 The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 67
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 2 Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, by the way, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61111111111 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25796270507 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3769812228 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261608948434 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847443994394 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11151176769 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167084785266 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639902097033 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.