As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
These days, in the conditions of constant urbanization the issue of rapidly growing transport networks has become the subject of considerable controversy. Despite the widely supported opinion that constructing more wide roads could mitigate the problem, this essay will prove that establishing better public transport system provides far greater benefits not only for traffic congestion, but for humanity.
First and foremost, an increasing number of people owning vehicles inevitably leads to the drastically rising release of pollutants in the air, which are obviously detrimental to human health and the planet as a whole. For example, only in Australia car ownership rates has grown for 30% comparing to a previous year. Consequantely, the air quality has deteriorated respectively. Therefore, in order to reduce these drawbacks governments should explore all possible ways to optimize the existing public transport infrastructure or create a brand new one.
Moreover, when it comes to big city centres, car owners may spend hours in traffic jams daily. It is clear, that uncontrolled road building outgrowth does not address the issue. Generally, the public transport and rail-based one in particular, was initially created with the purpose of solving this problem. Many cities all over the world work on making public communications more attractive option for city dwellers. For instance, the government in Melbourne made busses and some trains free for commuters, which considerably relieved the roads.
In conclusion, in spite of the illusory advantages of building more highways for car owning people, the detrimental effects of it should not be neglected. I firmly believe that authorities should consider the improvement already existing or creating better transportation networks for public transport instead of road construction.
- Some people think children should be given the freedom to make their own individual choices while others believe constant supervision from parents is required Which position is closer to your own opinion Support your point of view with reasons and or exam 88
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 77
- A serious problem affecting countries right across the globe is the lack of water for drinking washing and other household uses Why do many countries face water shortages and what could be done to alleviate the problem 80
- Television serves many functions Watching TV makes us relax We can learn knowledge and information from TV programs Besides TV can also be seen as a companion To what extent do you agree with this 88
- Some people point out that experiential learning can work well in formal education However other think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning is beneficial in high school or college 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6884057971 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06412938514 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670289855072 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4296090518 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343514970945 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100795566468 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643762525281 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1987800242 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489691414269 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.