Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In my opinion, I disagree with the statement. There are lots of great people respected by the public in their lifetime because of their achievements.
Indeed, there are still lots of celebrities’ reputation because of their scandals. Take Kobe Bryant as an suitable example. Kobe Bryant was a superstar of NBA, and he won NBA championship five times and got many individual rewards, such most valuable play and scoring championship. He was one of the greatest basketball players in our period without a doubt. However, in 2003, he was discredited by a sexual scandal, and he apologized to the public and pay a handsome amount of money for the female victim. Therefore, the reputation of some celebrities was diminished because of their negative scandals.
However, there are still a few people being esteemed by the public until today. For example, Morris Chang, the founder of TSMC which is the top-notch semiconductor company in the entire world, is highly respected by Taiwanese people until today. Morris Chang established TSMC in 1986, and he made lots of decisive policies to help TSMC become the most important semiconductor enterprise. He proposed that TSMC should only focus on manufacturing chips instead of designing them. As a result, TSMC received lots of orders from other well-known companies, such as Apple and Nvidia. In 2023, TSMC has become the largest semiconductor manufacturing company in the world, and Taiwan also becomes a crucial member of semiconductor supply chain. By contrast if Morris Chang had not decided to build TSMC, then it would have induced many seriously negative effects for the economy of Taiwan.
For another example, Alan Turing, the greatest computer scientist in the world, is still highly respected by British people. The most famous achievement of Alan Turing was that he deciphered the communication devices of Nazi Germany, and this result largely reduced the number of casualty of British army. Before Alan Turing deciphered German communication machines, the allies had had to lose more than five thousand soldiers each day. However, with his great accomplishment, the allies could finally defeat Nazi Germany in 1945 and save the European people from the reign of Nazi party. By contrast, if Alan Turing had not deciphered the communication machines of Germany, then Germany might have conquered the entire world with Japanese Empire.
To sum up, I disagree with the statement. Because there are still many people’s reputation not being diminished under the affects of media.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 58
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries 58
- The government should focus more on improving the Internet or public transportation system 66
- Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as a higher or a large fine when they cause 73
- Is it better to spend money on traveling and vacations or to save money for the future 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... of their scandals. Take Kobe Bryant as an suitable example. Kobe Bryant was a sup...
^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...rman communication machines, the allies had had to lose more than five thousand soldier...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sum up, I disagree with the statement. Because there are still many people’s reputatio...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27339901478 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84911923316 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524630541872 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.421862116 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3181818182 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0488623457806 0.243740707755 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0165751036948 0.0831039109588 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029532642369 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0335588496171 0.150359130593 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339175419788 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.