It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighbourhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
No one can deny the fact that opening different sorts of restaurant has become a trend nowadays. This has various positive as well as negative effects in the surrounding. In the given scenario, it is said that if new eatery center is going to start in my neighbourhood, whould I agree or oppose this plan? Meanwhile, I am of the opinion that no new cafe should be built in my society. I feel thies way for several reasons which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To start with, having big hotel is definitely advantegeous for the people out there. Having said that, in the small community like ours it is not the great idea to built there. To be more precise, this will create a lot of disturbance as the increment in the flow of people will burgeon. Drawing from my owm experience, in our society there is a small hotel where many people gathers. This has undoubtedly create such a noisy environment to us. we cannot even concentrate in our work. Unquestionably, no one goes to restaurant to obtain a tranquility environment. People either goes for meeting, gatherings, partying and so on resulting the sound pollution. This will surely create disturbing situation in the area.
Secondly, constructing a hotel near residential are hampers the social security. To be more clear, there is a policy to welcome every customer irrespective of their social status. Similary, no one is mindful of the type of people either they are gentleman or the person with bad intention. For instance, if a person visit the place with the mindset to steal then this will not only cause property loss but also invade privacy. Indeed, restaurant acts a bridge where people from all over the places can enter into the society with a concept of valid reason or bad deed. Therefore, I cannot have an imaginationof big restaurant in my locatily.
As we can see, although hotels are welcoming for people in various aspect however the cons associated with it should not be overlooked. Hence, in the local community it is not better to open restaurant, instead city area would be perfect fit for it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-02 | prakriti malla | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Students who are given grades work harder than those who are not Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is said that if new eatery center is going to start in my neighbourhood, whou...
^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...ny people gathers. This has undoubtedly create such a noisy environment to us. we cann...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge where people from all over the places can enter into the society with a concep...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i feel, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78670360111 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79739993525 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570637119114 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.7180333443 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.5454545455 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4090909091 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111665323113 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320747841697 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323872615911 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722299322704 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469690417202 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.