Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking.
One school of thought holds that in this era of groundbreaking technology, human being tends to lose the habit of walking regularly. This essay attempts to shed light on the driving factors behind this tendency before outlining several viable solutions that should be adopted to tackle this.
There are two primary reasons as to why strolling is found mundane. Firstly, this problem stems from the advancement of state-of-the-art machines and vehicles. This is because, due to various apparatuses which are conducive to the commutation of the dweller, namely elevators and automobiles have been devised, the involvement in physical activities is no longer vital for them, thereby leading to a sedentary lifestyle of the majority of inhabitants in Vietnam, for specific. Secondly, with the rapid changes in the industrialized world, spending time walking might be seen as a time-consumed activity. For instance, instead of hiking around the parks, regardless of the severe air degradation in Beijing, the young generation is prioritizing working overtime in order to earn a remunerative salary and upgrade their living standard.
To combat this worrying issue, the following essential steps should be taken. First and foremost, the governing bodies should alleviate the citizen’s overuse of technological gadgets by raising their awareness about their hazardous impact on people's well-being such as the overweight in adolescence. Secondly, having got a deep insight into the advantages of strolling through media campaigns, dwellers are able to appreciate and contribute to making this more widespread in leaps and bounds. In addition, the more widened pavements are constructed by authorities, the more pedestrians are promoted to initiate hiking more often.
In conclusion, there are some underlying motives behind this negative phenomenon, and it is crucial that the aforementioned measures be implemented to deal with this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ililmaidatuz | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | maiduc | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 89 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | queanh | 78 | view |
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls on noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 56
- The top priority of businesses is making money and they do not need to have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64846416382 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10491679992 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655290102389 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0362223764 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.916666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0914064577462 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332711579366 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484265200475 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459750596858 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398297048887 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.