The maps show the changes in the plan of house in 2010 compared to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate alternatives taken place in the scheme of house in 2010 in comparison to 2020.
Overall, the building has some changes in its interior space and its exterior space as well, however some locations in plase remained the same, in the decade.
To begin with, the exterior space of the house like the garden in north, the entrences ‘ location and a study bedroom in side of the entrance in westside, stayed as they were in 2010, however an extra study bedroom between the prior one and the entrance, added, almost as the same size of the other one. besides parking, which was located in southern part of the exterior area in 2020, was a garden back in 2010. It is noticable from the maps that a living room in west side, next to the prior garden , eliminated in 2010.
On the other hand, in interior area, the living room doubled in size in north west of the scheme, and the hall, get smaller almost twice its size in sought west of the map. Although kitchen had twice its size for 2020, it became social area either. An ensite bathroom was built between study room in south west wich remained the same and hall. Bathroom’s location changed a little and a study bedroom in north changed it’s shape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | LauraTing | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | bassmodulators123 | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-31 | bassmodulators123 | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-31 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 61
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant W
- The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...most as the same size of the other one. besides parking, which was located in southern ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arden back in 2010. It is noticable from the maps that a living room in west side...
^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m in west side, next to the prior garden , eliminated in 2010. On the other ha...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it became social area either. An ensite bathroom was built between study room in...
^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...le and a study bedroom in north changed it’s shape.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, well, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57272727273 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22006463055 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3582645447 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120938932888 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064031888574 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648812204118 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993570434411 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804915164319 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.