The chart shows the proportion of working age adults in four countries from 1960 to 2015. Units are given in percentages.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provides information about the rate of people at working age in 4 countries over 90 years from 1960 to 2050.
Overall, it can be seen that the proportion of working people witnessed a fluctuation in all countries between 1960 and 2020. Moreover, the trends of 4 countries are continued to fall during 40 years from 2010 to 2050.
Looking at the chart for more details, it can be seen that the figure for German workers had the highest point in 1960, at more than 65%. but then it had a fluctuation from 1970 to 1990. Finally, it reduced significantly over 60 years later, at 55%. The similar trend was true for Japan, starting at 65% and then it continued to progress to about 70%, which was the highest data of the chart, like in Germany, but then this percentage will be decreased sharply in 2050.
Turning to these other two, the rate of workforce in France and United States progressed gradually from 1960 to 1990, but then it may be continued to decline in the next 60 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Giang Tran | 44 | view |
- The pie chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ighest point in 1960, at more than 65%. but then it had a fluctuation from 1970 to ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, may, moreover, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 820.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53038674033 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45086011468 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4542736832 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150846277755 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702152608967 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05221143401 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109453085391 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495646697438 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.