The chart gives information about Someland s main exports in 2000 2005 and 2015

Essay topics:

The chart gives information about Someland's main exports in 2000, 2005 and 2015.

The bar graph illustrates the export growth in two types of primary products, which are meat, dairy, and international tourism in Someland between 2000 and 2015.

In general, it is apparent that international tourism and the export of goods made from milk took the lead in the total export billion, becoming the most dominant products in Someland. In contrast, exporting meat products did not generate huge profits in comparison with the others.

Looking at the two highest categories, in 2000, international tourism earned the highest revenue, at approximately 6 billion, which was much more far-clips than the revenue from meat export. After that, the figures for profits created by international tourism experienced a sharp upward trend, reaching approximately 8 billion dollars in 2015. It is also notable that next in the ranking, dairy merchandise placed as the second-highest export, at around 5 billion dollars in 2000 before taking the lead to reach the peak at 9 billion dollars in 2005. Afterward, these figures witnessed a drop in dairy consumption.

Turning to the lowest category, the figure for exporting meat products stood at 4 billion dollars in 2000 before seeing a gradual decline to 3 billion dollars in 2015.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-20 hahoaan 84 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 67 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 78 view
2024-09-27 Sheikh Sajib 61 view
2024-09-24 Sheikh Sajib view
Essays by user tieuquynh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... milk took the lead in the total export billion, becoming the most dominant products in...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, second, so, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89715917276 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5987938437 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175309599333 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822460696062 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051670923934 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125845939817 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312168780346 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.