Some people argue that mobile phones should be banned in public, while other believe that the use of mobile phones is the basic rights of a human. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The 21st century is highlighted by modern technologies which bring many benefits and convenience to the general population. Nevertheless, in many countries around the world, the use of mobile phones, especially in public, is usually argued with constant debate for its advantages and drawbacks. In my opinion, mobile phones should be prohibited in public sites, such as transport, theatres or restaurants.
The mobile phone is primarily responsible for public disruptions. When one focuses on the digital screen, he or she will be distracted from the potential dangers in public sites. For example, in 2012, hundreds of people were recorded as severely damaged or injured because of an individual’s carelessness when crossing the road. This serious urban problem was blamed for a famous game during that time, Pokemon Go, which was played and controlled via a digital screen with the most innovative features at the moment. As a result, hundreds of people were captivated by the mobile game even when they were walking across the road, leading to miserable accidents for which the excessive use of mobile phones was blamed. The examples of the downside of using mobile phones in public are many. Meanwhile, increasing volume is often considered impolite or even offensive. Therefore, with a new policy for prohibiting the use of cell phones in public, especially when one participates in public transport, I believe a city can reduce the urban disruptions from noise pollution and merit the individual citizens simultaneously.
On the negative side, this policy can be seen as unnecessary and directly impair the citizens’ rights. It is worth mentioning that many people use mobile phones not only for entertainment but also for primary importance of their own, such as making phone calls to their families or colleagues, studying or working online, or receiving recent updates on significant things in their life. Moreover, to be able to use one’s personal property is the basic rights of all citizens regardless of permanent or temporary residence. Therefore, the policy, if implemented, will result in high unsatisfactory in the general population and a local authority should sensibly tackle the negative issues resulting from the continuous use of the mobile phone and simultaneously satisfy the demands of the population.
As suggested above, a city should work on the proposal of banning mobile phones in public sites due to a variety of urban disruptions coming from a tiny electronic device. However, the local authority should also consider the needs of its members and respect their rights and privacy.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial support To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people argue that mobile phones should be banned in public while other believe that the use of mobile phones is the basic rights of a human Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people believe that culture would be ruined if it is used to earn tourism revenue but others consider that tourism is the only hope to protect a culture Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Write an essay discussing two of the facilitie which facility should be given money from the local authority in your notes You should explain which facility it is more important for local authorities to give money to giving reasons in support of your answ 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 415.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32048192771 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95106063831 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551807228916 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4578332374 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.882352941 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327093263227 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111202550299 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887690534197 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202108539976 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160561238008 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.