Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that some countries have focused on building specialized facilities to train top athletes to achieve international success, rather than providing sports facilities for everyone. In my opinion, this is a negative development because it neglects the needs of the wider population and promotes elitism in sports.
On the one hand, building specialized facilities for top athletes can help a country to achieve international success in sports and bring prestige and recognition. For example, hosting international sports events can bring in tourism revenue and boost the economy. Additionally, specialized facilities can provide top-notch training and resources to athletes, who can then represent their country at the highest level of sports.
On the other hand, focusing solely on building specialized facilities for top athletes neglects the needs of the wider population. Access to sports facilities is crucial for maintaining physical and mental health, and it is unfair to prioritize elite athletes over the general public. Moreover, promoting elitism in sports can discourage participation from individuals who may not have access to specialized facilities, leading to a decline in overall interest in sports.
In conclusion, while building specialized facilities for top athletes can lead to international success in sports and bring recognition to a country, it is a negative development if it neglects the needs of the wider population and promotes elitism in sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will be no longer necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 73
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 78
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...r to prioritize elite athletes over the general public. Moreover, promoting elitism in sports ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65178571429 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17002009828 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477678571429 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8796766157 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500125852447 0.244688304435 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236501746546 0.084324248473 280% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15895664268 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35956844588 0.151304729494 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972323634619 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.