Today, the quality of life in large cities is decreasing. Discuss the causes and solutions.
City life has become more challenging recently, which is mainly due to urbanization and industrialization. This phenomenon can be tackled with adequate management and enhancement of low.
Initially, people who lived in big cities often face pollution and a low-quality lifestyle. The main reason behind this is escalating polluted contaminants in air, water, and food products probably due to busy work-life imbalance. For instance, working personnel often rely on fast food and instant local restaurants which do not have enough qualified cuisine and materials. Secondly, most of the cities are overcrowded with unemployed residents which may lead to crime, robbery, and a lack of security for common people. The crime rate would be exceeded in urban areas when compares to rural spaces around the world. Finally, inflation largely affected the cities in terms of utility bills, household chores, and daily needs which is two times higher in contrast to villages.
Nevertheless, the government can implement proper law and order, an appropriate management system, and effective guidance to society to improve the standard of life. In other words, the enforcement agencies would minimize the causative factor with punishment, and warning, thereby people are more aware of waste disposal, unwanted vehicle uses, and food adulteration. Similarly, Governing services for illiterate people and employment facilities for the needy would reduce violence. Arrange recreational facilities or job-oriented classes for criminals and unemployed youngsters. Along with that, initiate relevant information and guidance to hack excessive charges for their daily needs. For instance provide information regarding the peak time of electric charge, advanced and money saving shopping tricks and so on. Encourage families to involve in family time and find the best route to improve their imbalance of life includes child care and psychological development of all members which flourish the overall development if people who lived in such areas.
To sum up, it is inevitable to stay back in large cities for many and they are facing many issues and problems in their life; however, it can be decreased with above-mentioned factors to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Wangdu | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Kcute | 11 | view |
- Many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable to repay. It should, therefore, be made more difficult for individuals to borrow large amounts of money.What is your opinion on this? 73
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- In many countries people are working increasingly longer hours What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or a negative effect 61
- The pie charts show figures for the use of public libraries in 1990 and 2000 in Britain Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the uk devided into three categories, from 1995 -2002. summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o stay back in large cities for many and they are facing many issues and problems...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58235294118 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9506963579 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5325986638 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127873434308 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385252593822 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481081630568 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910681012005 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446661240958 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.