Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People who have had difficulty learning a skill go on to become better teachers of that skill than people who learned that skill easily. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
All people are different, so everyone spend his personal the amount of time and efforts to study something. A man, who learned skill easily and a man, who worked hardly usually have similar result, but who will be the best teacher? I definitely think that the man who made more efforts will be the best teacher. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, people who have had difficulty learning a skill are more competent in this subject. So, if a man learned a skill easily, obvious he spends less time to explore the subject than a man who worked hardly. Therefore, the second man probably is more knowledgeable and more competent in details than the first. For instance, when I studied for my exam on business-statistics, I was preparing with my friend. The subject was very complicated for me, but my friend had not any issues. So, while I was studying, I was very attentive and thorough, moreover I paid attention to all details. In contrast, my friend refers to the subject cursory. He did not spend much time because he was very successful on lection and tests. Therefore, I had become more competent in the subject than my friends and I got better grade on the exam.
Secondly, people who have had difficulty learning a skill are more patient and tolerant. The main point is that such people know that someone may have issues with the subject, because they were in the same situation in the past, so they will be more patient. Moreover, people who worked hardly to develop the skill, probably know how they can teach more efficiently a man who has issues with subject as they had, so maybe they have some tips and tricks for a man for whom learning is not so easy.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that people who spend a lot of time to develop the skill are more competent as a teacher than people who learned the skill easily.
- If you could go back to any time and place in the past when and where would you go Why Use specific reasons and explanations to support your answer 66
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 76
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 60
- Many people have learned a foreign language in their own country others have learned a foreign language in the country in which it is spoken Which is better 73
- TOEFL iBT Test 2 integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'worked'.
Suggestion: hardly worked
...who learned skill easily and a man, who worked hardly usually have similar result, but who wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'worked'.
Suggestion: hardly worked
...l be more patient. Moreover, people who worked hardly to develop the skill, probably know how...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56764705882 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55420644981 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464705882353 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8993349736 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3529411765 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330949568988 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128049329621 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139843155595 0.0737576698707 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25389992201 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773588471435 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.