It is sometimes better to hide truth or always remain honest?
Nowadays, the traditional virtue of telling the truth is increasingly being doubted. Many believe that telling the truth is not always the best policy when dealing with people. I feel that sometimes it is better to conceal the truth for someone’s sake. I hold this opinion mainly for two major reasons.
Firstly, we all know that the truth often offends people and may not be very pleasing to hear. Lies, on the other hand offer various advantages. The manipulation of these lies is most obvious in the business world. Many times we hear that product is the finest and cheapest. These advertisements are all about persuasion, and many would agree that if companies would tell the absolute truth, then nobody would be interested in their products. The same logic can be applied to human relationships. If a friend of yours had worn a new dress on her birthday and excitedly asked you how it looked, then you wouldn’t break her heart saying that it is not pretty and spoil her birthday.
Secondly, telling small lies can even sometimes motivate people. Humans are very competitive and want to do best in every assigned task. Whether they are involved in the athletic or academic field, they feel motivated to strive for their goals if prompted or encouraged to do so. For instance, once one of my friends was interested in participating in the painting competition and when she asked me if she should take part or not, I told her to go ahead. Although, I was aware of high the competition, she would have to face, but I didn’t tell her about this and told her that she has high probability to be in top ten positions. As a result, she encouraged to take part and started practicing for it.
In conclusion, I would like to reaffirm my point that it is not necessary to always speak truth. There are several benefits associated like encouraging people to do something or not hurting their feelings by telling straight harsh truths. Therefore, due to the aforementioned causes, I would always prefer to conceal truth, possibly if it does any good to anyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-12 | Anurag96 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | anon7652 | 70 | view |
| 2021-05-04 | Greenbluemind | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-28 | Uhernandes95 | 75 | view |
| 2020-06-24 | bijan54 | 70 | view |
- Ecotourism as a possible solution for ameliorating the conditions of rainforest area and its people 70
- Face to face communication is better than other modes of communications Do you agree or not 76
- Advertisements 76
- One should travel only during young age Do you agree or not 66
- Some famous athletes and entertainers earn millions of dollars every year Do you think these people deserve such high salaries Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 70, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... truth often offends people and may not be very pleasing to hear. Lies, on the other hand offer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 646, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in top ten positions. As a result, she encouraged to take part and started prac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, even so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75977653631 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70337960528 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569832402235 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1721983083 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130015922668 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435812655372 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669890887096 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989202291369 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795254033165 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.