Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that watching a live performance gives us more sense of excitement than the TV broadcasted show. Though there are some appeals when enjoying the performance on TV, I am inclined to the eye-to-eye experience.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some people prefer broadcasted show or event.
Firstly, some might find the inconvenience in buying tickets or preparing the trip to execute their attendance at the revenue. Also, they many feel uncomfortable as they are afraid of the so-called unpleasant environment or the risk of injury when hustling in a crowd. In addition, TV watchers are likely to have better vision of the performance thank to the intention of directors or the movements of cameramen via close-up footage of high solution images, which are certainly affected or engendered by the surrounding when you attend the event. In fact, the matter of vision is decided by the cost of your tickets, which means that you have to pay extra fees for clear view, whereas it is almost free or even costs you little for premium subscription to enjoy the event with comfort at home.
Nevertheless, I claim that those who are in favour of televised shows may ignore the sense of participation and interaction that live performance offer. Apparently, only attending the event at the stadium or auditorium can attendees enjoy the exuberant excitement that the expererience at home can not compare. For instance, football fans come to the stadium not only to watch the football match, but also to be a part of the cheering crowd and to warm up the environment as the sense of joining the spectacle is what mainly draws people to spend time and money for the event. Additionally, it is a chance for people to show respect and appreciation for their idols or performers. I personally can not forget the time I gave the ochestra a great ovation for their splendid performance, which is a rewarding experience for both performers and audiences or spectacles.
In conclusion, while it is comfortable and economical to watch broadcasted events, I am compelled to the real attendance at the concert.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | dinhngocquynh2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | Pham Van Nhan | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | trinhthanh1 | 67 | view |
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Young people learn good behaviour more from movies and books than real life experiences To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The most important consideration when choosing any career orjob is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people argue that parents of children who break the law should be punished in some way because they are responsible for their children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In conclusion, while it is comfortable and economical to watch broadcasted even...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94943820225 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99240506444 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0247791363 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.538461538 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27090981018 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848799594086 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424763080612 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129803376504 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428005018971 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.