Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that people have different views on building houses similar to the previous ones in neighborhoods. While the others have made the arguments that residents should create their own houses in uneven styles, I am of the opinion that houses can be constructed depending on their interests and characteristics.
On the one hand, there are several reasons to support the idea of house-building uniformity. Firstly, the aesthetic value of the residential areas is enhanced thanks to the homogeneity of house building. It will make the general views of local areas become more colorful and elegant. For example, there are numerous styles of housing including traditional style, Scandinavian style, modernist or standardised style. The architects could choose a style and apply for all houses in the local place based on the planning permission. Secondly, similar houses can be able to create an iconic area. This may become a good tourist attraction and help the locals to earn profits from tourism business.
Despite the above arguments, I maintain that housing construction following the owner’s personality can provide several benefits. Firstly, the freedom to choose the housing style can facilitate the creativity of people nowadays. They can make their house with many pleasing geometric forms or apply the art deco in their living house. Last but not least, the owner could design their house based on their budget and there is no pressure on the problem of building a house similar to their neighbors.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to create a house relying on our budget and interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | trinhthanh1 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | nganphuong05 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-26 | paenziii | 67 | view |
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people argue that parents of children who break the law should be punished in some way because they are responsible for their children s actions To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The most important consideration when choosing any career orjob is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21481481481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80530557498 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3631308061 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.571428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41852539739 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138608175624 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541868262648 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241743809607 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738098948167 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.