Some people believe that teaching music in schools is a vital part of growing up and the human experience, whilst others believe that teaching music in schools is a waste of time and resources. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Gifted education has been a controversial topic of debate in recent years. Some people think that teaching music in schools is an appropriate way for students to grow up and be taught positive behavior. However, another group of people believes it wastes time and resources. I strongly support the idea that music should be taught in schools.
On the one hand, education is intended to improve people’s knowledge and physical health. Besides the demands/ needs of knowledge, it is essential to develop learners’ spirits which take shape in songs’ melody and lyrics. Moreover, music is a very valuable form of entertainment. Students can relax their minds when they attend music performances in class or at school. Talented musicians and singers are almost always discovered in gifted schools where vocation subjects are focused on.
On the other hand, if students have to learn many music periods at school, they do not have enough time to concentrate on their main subjects. Instead of putting emphasis on Maths, Literature, it takes students 2 periods a week to learn music.
In my opinion, because of a gift subject, schools should offer students the freedom of choice to attend classes that they think they are proficient at. Additionally, gift periods should not coincide with primary ones to avoid wasting learners' time.
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese between 1965 to 2015 while the pie chart demonstrates the part of adults who were overweight obese severely obese and healthy or underweight in 2015 73
- Many people use social media every day to keep in touch with friends and get social news Do you think the advantages of it outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover, so, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21296296296 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70856678323 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657407407407 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4288832883 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6153846154 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6153846154 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246538229954 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08070930271 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698823036976 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143457875901 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735914113603 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.