In the future, all cars, buses, and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is envisaged that autonomous vehicles will replace human drivers in the future. I think that the benefits of the advance outweigh their drawbacks as they provide convenience for senior individuals and the disabled, and they also diminish human errors.
On the one hand, the development brings about some downsides. The first one is that many drivers will lose their jobs. Once this practice gains in popularity, many drivers will find their work obsolete and have to seek alternative sources of income; however, this problem can be tackled by investments in other employment markets or government assistance to help former drivers find other jobs. Another unfavourable aspect of this trend is private security. In order to function appropriately, the personal data of clients need collecting, which may lead to potential issues related to identity theft. When hackers successfully steal one’s private information, customers will probably face several threats, such as blackmail and emotional distress.
On the other hand, despite the mentioned negative impacts, the frequency of occurrence is relatively low and can be addressed; the positive sides of applying automated vehicles are more prominent to see. Firstly, the elderly and the disabled can benefit from this form of transit. All driverless cars are programmed to operate accurately thanks to their computer software and clever algorithms. Therefore, the old and handicapped people, who are mostly dependent on others and do not have the ability to self-travel, are able to commute on the road with a few clicks on the computer screen. Secondly, self-driving vehicles have the ability to eradicate human errors. Human beings, who are fallible and potentially dangerous, are prone to severe road accidents due to subjective factors, including speeding and drowsiness. Automated cars are able to detect obstacles and predict unexpected situations, thereby reducing traffic incidents.
In conclusion, although self-driving vehicles can cause some downsides, I believe these undesirable repercussions are eclipsed by their merits, which are providing convenience for the elderly and the disabled and eradicating fatal human flaws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 61
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 56
- A big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64954682779 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93172180532 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619335347432 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.779668924 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161856174081 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045833558494 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412212704718 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879219571965 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270405648069 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.