In some countries, if people need to find work, they have to move away from their families and their friends. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, more and more people sacrifice the chance to live near their families and friends to relocate for work. Despite some obvious disadvantages of this trend, I believe that these are outweighed by the advantages.
On the one hand, there are a number of drawbacks when people move away from their families and friends to find jobs. The first drawback is that people may be forced to accept low-paid work and exploitation of labor and a working environment that is dangerous. For example, migrant workers from undeveloped countries with limited language abilities have no choice except to do manual labor from 12 to 16 hours per day in factories or farms without any occupational safety and health. Another drawback is that people who live far from their families and friend are easier to experience mental health problems than others. Physical distance discourages migrant workers from sharing their problems with their beloved ones; therefore, they tend to suffer from troubles on their own. Consequently, they are more vulnerable to mental health issues, such as depression, while their families remain unknown.
On the other hand, I believe that benefits are more significant than disadvantages. Firstly, moving to bigger cities or countries which are the center of large industries opens more new career opportunities and significantly higher wages. Workers may have enough money for their lives and to send money home to their families. Secondly, migrant workers can advance their careers faster than people who live with their families. Because of living far from families and friends, they do not suffer from family conflicts or friends’ arguments which could negatively influence their productivity and work performance. Thus, young people can wholeheartedly devote their time and effort to their work.
To sum up, I would argue that moving away from families and friends for work opportunities brings more benefits than drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-07 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-08 | hinhin411 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | Vivi_peach | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | thaoduong1902 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australia exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 73
- The charts show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B 67
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods 56
- The diagram shows the different stages in the production of woolen goods
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who is responsible for preventing environmental damage 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in fact, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37012987013 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71289500195 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0691767999 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.266666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460274568718 0.244688304435 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157506048326 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826487229773 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271116114249 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755268705613 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.