Summarize the points made in the lecture and explain how the speaker casts doubt on
specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about the organization that often arranged individuals to a single team in order to attain accomplished job. The author of the reading states that there are numerous advantages of asigning task to a group rather than single employee. The lecturer opposes the idea and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading states that since there are number of individuals, they can contribute the varieties of knowledge. In addition, this aids to finish asigned project in time with effective output. The lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that although project could be complete within deadline, some individual might contribute less to the project as individual performance would not be evaluated.
Secondly, if project goes well then every one in the group is appreciated for their effort. On contrary, if not then all will be accountable. The speaker on other hand points out that there may be few personnels who confer their 100 percent in their task however in a group project their determination would not be recognized and they could not flourish.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that, individual will feel better and motivated if their proposed idea is appreciated. As a result they will shine as the group result is far reaching and can have impact to great extent. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that, it is challenging to reach the decision since individuals might have different perspective toward the task. Therefore, if any of the member refutes the proposed concept then again they need to do further discussion and it takes time.
As we know, the author and lecturer holds confliction views on group task. The speaker effectively challenges writer’s argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 81 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 75
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- owadays computers are widely used in education As a result some people think teachers no longer play important roles in classrooms To what extend do you agree or disagree 81
- The reading and lecture are both about the company policy which should be made compulsory for the employee It states that company should implement the four day a week work policy and it benefits the company in return The lecturer disagrees He mentions thi 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to a group rather than single employee. The lecturer opposes the idea and attacks e...
^^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaching'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reaching
... forth the idea that, it is challenging to reach the decision since individuals might ha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14478114478 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73508462605 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1532569035 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8823529412 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109299491265 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336500208388 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390993773651 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611621746825 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378358623146 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.