Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The dress code policy in the workplace is a widely debated topic, with some organizations emphasizing the importance of dressing smartly, while others prioritize quality of work over appearance. both views have their own merits, and in my opinion, the dress code policy should depend on the type of organization and its work culture.
Organizations that prioritize dressing smartly believe that employees' appearance reflects the organizataon's professionalism and promotes a positive image to customers and clients.
For instance, a law firm, where employees interact with clients regularly, would benefit from employees dressing smartly to project a professional image. In such organizations, a dress code policy that emphasizes dressing formally, such as wearing suits, can help create a professional atmosphere that aligns with the organization's values.
On the other hand, organizations that value quality of work over appearance believe that the quality of work is more critical than appearance. In such organizations, employees are allowed to dress casually, as long as their work is completed on time and meets the required standards. For instance, a software development company, Where the employees mostly work behind the scene, may not place much importance on dressing smartly.
In my opinion, a balanced approach to the dress code policy is essential. The type of organization and its work culture should determine the dress code policy. In organizations that require constant clients, dressing formally may be necessary to project a professional image. However, in organizations that value creativity and innovation, allowing employees to dress casually can foster a relaxed and comfortable atmosphere that promotes innovation and creativity.
In Conclusion, both views on the dress code policy have their own merits. The dress code policy should align with the type of organization and its work culture, and a balanced approach is essential to create a work atmosphere that aligns with the organization's values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
...ritize quality of work over appearance. both views have their own merits, and in my ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...rioritize dressing smartly believe that employees appearance reflects the organizataons p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15055730993 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8064051337 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308964325161 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129253816289 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068052566073 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183382573102 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062219176923 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.