The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now.
The map illustrates the significant changes have been made in Pebbleton over the period of 20 years.
As can be seen from the graph, it is apparent that the most noticeable change was the addition of other facilities such as a footpath, a tennis court, and a community center as well as the replacement of the old fort with the children’s playground and the film studio with the flats along the river.
Specifically, on the western side of the city, while the lighthouse remained in the same position as its initial for 20 years, the old fort was demolished to make way for the construction of the children’s playground. In addition, the film studio which was located in the corner western side of the island was replaced by new flats. At present, the new footpath has been built in order to connect the coast road and the island, which greatly assisted students’ school across the river. There was also a footpath at the end of the footbridge, and a new tennis court was added between the footpath and a lighthouse land.
Regards to the north of the map, the number of local houses increased considerably throughout the examined period, whereas a community center was established, which was located near the residential area. Towards the eastern side of the city, almost every feature such as the old road, the playing field, and the roadbridge remained unchanged.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults Do you agree or disagree 89
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88510638298 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.750510056 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6606684851 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0311050677916 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0177694165678 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358348557321 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0309668478906 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044834974427 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.