Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Wealthy nations commonly provide financial aid for less developed nations, but this approach alone does not effectively address poverty. Consequently, developed nations can use many different methods to assist poor nations, instead of relying on monetary aid. In my opinion, I completely agree.
Why do developed nations provide money to not improve poor countries? Because giving money to poor nations, they still receive money, but the reason for less development of a nation are many causes including lack of education, institutional weaknesses, and unequal distribution of resources. Firstly, with a nation's lack of education, it can not know how to use reasonable money, and inequalities occur with many of society's vices. Education can provide individuals with the skills and knowledge to improve the economy of a nation in many ways. When the fundamental education is strong, awareness of citizens will be improved and promote social mobility. Secondly, institutional weaknesses and unequal distribution of resources can create barriers to economic growth and development of a poor nation, which can hinder the potential for individuals and communities to improve their standard of living.
Providing financial aid is not good for less developed nations. Rich nations should use many different methods in many fields such as support education or orientate about policies. In detail, the ways of approaching modern education from wealthy nations will be communicated and disseminated to poor countries to help them have a strong fundamental education. In addition, wealthy countries should share knowledge about development. Knowledge sharing is an effective way to help poorer countries build up their own capacity. This could include sharing expertise in areas such as economic development, governance, public administration, agriculture, and health.
In conclusion, I agree that financial aid from wealthy nations is insufficient to address poverty in less developed nations, and I suggest that utilizing various non-financial approaches would be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-25 | viet@2002 | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | quan12341234 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | ngandaqueen | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | cinderel | 61 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rty. Consequently, developed nations can use many different methods to assist poo...
^^
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...onsequently, developed nations can use many different methods to assist poor nations, instead...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...eloped nations. Rich nations should use many different methods in many fields such as support ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76298701299 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1076076136 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555194805195 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9826213188 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205469842334 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766667659993 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726327751116 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124992394823 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417829234721 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.