It is the responsibility of schools to teach children good behavior in addition to providing formal education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that schools should be responsible for educating youngsters about how to behave properly on top of teaching the mandatory curriculum. From my personal perspective, I totally disagree with this view due to teachers’ limited expertise to do so and schools’ syllabus becoming more challenging.
The first reason why I argue that schools should not teach good manners to children is that it is not reasonable to expect teachers, who are primarily trained in academic knowledge, to be experts in teaching good behavior. To be more specific, they are only educated with academic knowledge required for the school subjects. Moreover, some teachers may exhibit inappropriate behavior themselves, which would undermine their credibility as role models. A perfect instances would be stories about teachers discriminating students based on their sexual orientation, bullying students for their poor acedemic performances, or even molesting them.
An additional justification is that the burden of school curriculum has increased substantially in recent years, leaving little room for additional subjects such as manners. Students nowadays are required to learn a wide range of subjects, including mathematics, physics, biology, languages, and extracurricular activities, such as clubs and volunteering. Adding a subject on manners would only make the curriculum more burdensome and challenging for students, who already struggle with time management and stress.
In conclusion, I’m firmly convinced that it is not schools’ function to impart how to act well to their young students. My arguments include the insufficient qualifications of the teachers and increasing study workloads. Given that educational institutions should only focus on its original purpose which is teaching formal academic knowledge for the future workforce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Annie Nguyen 07_09 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations, while others think that it is practical aid an advice that is needed. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages 56
- The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. 56
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84501845018 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20722587987 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645756457565 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8906028418 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196027136587 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647738282821 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617224448165 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112938974187 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462017457356 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.