The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate a number of proposed changes that are to take place in the town of Hunderstone.
In general, while the area to the east of the railway will remain almost the same, the western side is going to undergo several significant changes, especially with regards to the transport infrastructure.
As can be seen in the first map, Hunderstone Town is currently divided into two main areas by a railway line, which runs from north to south and passes by a gas station. To the west of the railway, there is an air field which is connected to the main road (A1). A roundabout in the middle of this road connects the A1 road to the east of the town, and in particular, to the ring road around the town centre.
In the future, the airfield in the north west of Hunderstone Town is expected to be replaced by an industrial estate. A new railway line will also be constructed to provide further access to this area. In addition, a new, larger roundabout will be constructed midway along the road connecting the east and west of the town. A new road (A4) which will connect the A1 to the town centre will also be built in the south of the town.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows information about three different types of restaurants Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows a survey result of 4000 participants who expressed what important aspects they have learned from the internship they have completed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in addition, in general, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43396226415 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57693993673 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0525951809 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104538356624 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529578719974 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408007376449 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721375660652 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484648835936 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.