Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries. What are the causes? Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history.
Understanding history has long been viewed as the fundamental background that a plethora of countries or schools want their students and citizens to have. Interestingly, youngsters nowadays have a tendency to put their interest into pop stars or idols rather than several notable heroes in their history. The following essay will discuss the causes and offer some solutions to tackle this problem.
To begin with, there are many reasons causing this position. First, it is obvious that the domination of the entertainment industry is the root cause of this problem. In other words, when all media focus on movies, and how celebrities dress and speak, they accidentally draw great attention mostly from the youth, and stars' lifestyles may be appealing to those young people. On the other hand, there is no doubt that the test-based education system is also a considerable factor leading to this situation. To be more specific, students at schools nowadays try hard just to get the best scores and sometimes they did not put their interest to do any research in the past. In fact, they cramp to get the passing scores, and they are pleased with that. Above all, this is not an encouraging situation, and we have to work together to change this position.
That leaves the question of what we can do to handle these problems. Firstly, we cannot deny the fact that enhancing teaching methods will always play a key role in solving these troubles. This means that schools are able to mesmerize undergraduates with the trite lessons of history by designing attractive lessons with presentations, plays, and field trips. It is worth pointing out that these actions will help students to develop their knowledge of History. Besides, numerous people believe that government efforts may also contribute to limiting this situation remarkably. To be more detailed, some practical actions could be taken such as integrating historical elements with movie stars who are at the peak of their career and creating blockbusters in which historical heroes, events, and the presence of movie stars are all included. All people should bear in mind that only the efforts of the entire society can bring the most successful solution.
In conclusion, the fact that idolism is now dominating youngsters' minds and history is being ignored. However, with the attempt of all society, this is going to change in the nearest future.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club s activities facilities and opening hours Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make any comparisons whe 73
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10379746835 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69968159683 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587341772152 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.792624664 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.105263158 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84210526316 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148076414027 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04011599812 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327896635532 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862457754237 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392446301299 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.