The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits.
The given diagram illustrates a linear process of the manufacture of pears as canned fruits.
It is evident from the diagram that there are several stages required to make this product. Additionally, the production begins with the collection of pears and culminates with transporting the canned fruits to markets.
During the initial stage, pears are collected by hand picking and brought to a factory where they are washed to eliminate any dust particles. The subsequent step is called quality checking, during which pears are verified carefully. Following that, they are stored in low-temperature atmosphere in a storage. Once this step is over, pears are placed on a scale to be weighted and graded.
The process continues with peepling and coring/slicing, at which pears are cut into slides in order to be ready for the canning stage to happen. Subsequently, the cans are sealed and undergo a special treatment known as cooking/ sterilizing to be more suitable for the consumption of buyers. After being sterilized and cooked, the cans are labeled and placed in a storage. Finally, they are transported to markets where consumers can purchase them.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-09-09 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-09-05 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 11 | view |
2024-08-29 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 79
- The map below show the information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 67
- The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...kets where consumers can purchase them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22580645161 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92172521048 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1275136618 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3636363636 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244488239886 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889962951625 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719376639243 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168175080124 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844866455087 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.