The three pie charts below show the total spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
The three given pie charts compare a specific school in the UK in terms of how it allocated its budgets over a period of 20 years from 1981 to 2001.
It is evident from the charts that most of the money were spared for Teachers’ salaries. Additionally, an oscillating trend was recorded in all categories, except for the figures of Other workers’ salaries and Insurance.
In 1981, the school expensed a majority of its budgets for Teachers’ remunerations, with 40%, which outnumbered the share of Other workers’ salaries by approximately two to one, at 28%. At the same time, the rates of Resources and Furniture and equipment accounted for a comparable figure, at 15% of the total, compared to 2% of the money allotted to Insurance.
To 1991, the proportion of Teachers’ salaries increased marginally to 50%, at which point it started to undergo a minimal drop to 45% in 2001. Meanwhile, the figure for other workers’ remunerations dipped slowly to 22% and 15% in 1991 and 2001 respectively, compared to a fluctuation witnessed in that of Furniture and equipment to 23% in 2001. By contrast, whereas the percentage of Resources grew insignificantly to 20% in 1991, then plummeted to 9% in 2001, this school was inclined to spend more money on Insurance, with 3% and 8% of its budgets in 1991 and 2001 in turn.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-12 | vuhungbo | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | luftmensch | view |
- the plans below show how a ground floor of particular building has changed over time 73
- The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years 67
- The figures bolow compare the number of internet users in several European nation as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries 78
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges 73
- many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes Instead they get news about the world from the Internet Is this a positive or a negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87610619469 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06440128753 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.4065212255 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237192399627 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980105466563 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867116750968 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14300962114 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102251255505 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.