The diagram shows Lakeside development between years 2000 and 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagram illustrates the modernization of Lakeside over a period of nine years from 2000 to 2009.
It is evident from the diagram that Lakeside underwent some noticeable transformations, with the most typical one being the expansion of an Industrial Complex. Additionally, there was a river crossing the town from the North to the South.
To the west of the river, in 2000, there were a Residential area located in the northwest corner and a school to the south of it, whose locations remained unchanged to 2009. At the same time, adjacent to it was a Derelic warehouse and an Old town, which were demolished in favor of a Car park and Officies and Universities in turn. Meanwhile, the Art center flanked by the Residential area to the north and that to the south was substituted by a Cinema, compared to the introduction of a Shopping center at the position where the Residential area used to be.
In terms of the eastern area, the Industrial complex was enlarged, forcing the Residential area situated to the Southeast to disappear. In addition, whereas the location of the river did not change throughout the research time, the lake located to the North of it was pulled down to make way for the erection of a Pond.
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges
- The diagrams illustrate 3 different types of bridges 73
- many people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programmes Instead they get news about the world from the Internet Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- The pictures illustrate how the layout of a school library changed over five years 67
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76168224299 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89273473176 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0593703507 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.095739846423 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470483379972 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650911767781 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793285857864 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750675853056 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.