The chart below shows the number of households in the us by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart displays the proportion of US households by their annual income between 2007, 2011 and 2015.
All things considered, there is an increase in the number of households that earned less than $50,000 and more than %100,000. This means there was a disparity between the rich and the poor in the USA.
Firstly, the number of families earning less than $25,000 rose by years. In 2007, there was an exact number of 25 million households earned that amount of money a year, which soon went up by 3 million four years later before dropping to 26 million in 2015. The data of families earning a bit more but less than $50,000 followed the same trend. During the eight-year period, the figure hit the top with approximately 30 million households. On the other hand, the proportion of wealthy families also increased. In 2007, the number of households earning more than $100,000 was two times higher than those whose income was under $25,000. However, the figure soon decreased by 3 million before recovering to the peak of 33 million.
Secondly, as can be seen that the proportion of households whose income by year was more than $50,000 but less than $100,000 remained stable. The number of households who received $50,000-74,999 (22 million) was 1.5 times higher than those whose income was $75,000-99,999 (15 million).
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 78
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84304932735 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5008595116 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5767256727 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131113053537 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642050409037 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105189519359 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145169953856 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14504593663 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.