Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
While some people argue that Historical objects should be returned to their country of origin, I hold a different perspective.
On one hand, Returning historical objects can have cultural benefits. Firstly, this is an effective way to preserve national identiy, allowing countries to show off their cultural values, hence raising their profile in the world. Secondly, this practice could bring in proudness among citizens who alsways have a sense of respectful in terms of their countries’ histrory, as the results, foster individuals awarenes of protecting historical values. Lastly, those items after bringing back could be utilized for scientific researchs and served as potential materials for study.
Despite some benifial effects, I firmly believe that the disadvatages of this policy outweight the advantages. In fact, many countries don’t have proper preservation systems for these kind of objects, which can be a great concerns for the goverments because of the proceed deteriation of ancient objects, whereas in developed countries, those can be greatly protected by a range of experienced scientists, or displayed in pretigious museums and scientific instutions. Furthermore, transporting is also a challenge since it requires significant time, effort and finacial means, particulalry if they are deliveried frorm a far location, thus placing a strain on the government. For these reasons, I contend that historical objects should be proteced in certain areas that have appropriate methods and policies, ensuring their initial status not being damged
In conlusion, Although having some positive effects on cultures, Bringing old objects back to their original place is not a effective measure, therefore should not be encourage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below gives information about salaries of secondary high school teachers in five countries in 2009 56
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...’t have proper preservation systems for these kind of objects, which can be a great concer...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... concerns for the goverments because of the proceed deteriation of ancient objects, whereas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...bjects, whereas in developed countries, those can be greatly protected by a range of expe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cts back to their original place is not a effective measure, therefore should not...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71264367816 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97841404458 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.6801792549 49.4020404114 200% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.666666667 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8888888889 7.06120827912 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265889380583 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107784363484 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101733918883 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197892314499 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684634069542 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.37 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.