Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The amount of budget is not unlimited, and therefore the government should prioritize where the money should go. This leads people to debate whether the government should focus on the immediate problems or the foreboded future problems. Although it is undeniable that the government should strive to resolve the imminent social issues, I think that the argument that the government should focus only on those issues rather than the possible future problems is too myopic.
Granted, there are a lot of problems that the government should resolve, so it is an utter balderdash that the government should focus on forestalling the future problems. For example, in case of dealing with poverty, there are already a myriad of paupers who suffer from the dire situation, such as a shortage of education, electricity, and even food and water. Although it is necessary to prevent the possible future poverty, saving those people is also an important issue. Although the previous example is limited to poverty, the same logic can be extended to the problems such as public health; many people are suffering from the existing problem, so neglecting those and simply focusing on the future problems is not desirable.
However, simply focusing on the present problem is, as mentioned above, too myopic in that it is not even economic. Take poverty, the very example discussed above, as an example. Although the policy to save the poor people from the currently existing poverty should be make, the policy does not guarantee the overall decrease of those people if the fundamental root of the poverty is not deracinated. And deracination is most efficiently done through the policy focusing on the future problem, in that it evades the possible damage by preventing the possible problem before it actually happens.
In brief, although focusing on the immediate problem is important, the policy on the possible future problem is also important in that it can curtail the possible future expense by preempting the future problem. Therefore, the government should implement the prophylactic policy in conjunction with the policy on the immediate problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 63
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 62
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...he currently existing poverty should be make, the policy does not guarantee the over...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in brief, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 344.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22674418605 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71779783918 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450581395349 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8105957281 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.307692308 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 10.2758426966 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263097673528 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113053828521 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721360764117 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189989195572 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544164763658 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.