If old people are no longer physically, mentally or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people hold the view that young family members should be held legal responsibility for taking care of their older generations when they are not in a state of wellness or financial autonomy. I totally agree with this notion and the essay below aims to clarify my view.
On the one hand, descendants are certainly in the best position to take care of their elder family members if they are not able to look after themselves. This is because parents have sacrificed lots of their time and effort to nurture their offspring and ensure to bring them all the best. Therefore, when they are inevitably getting older, the duty of care naturally falls to younger individuals who possess the abilities and financial resources to provide the needed support. This is also an opportunity for descendants to return the favor to their original caregivers. As a result, it is completely reasonable for young people to be liable for taking care of their older blood relatives.
On the other hand, some might argue that younger family members supporting their older generations should be voluntary so they can feel more comfortable when they engage in this activity. However, this argument overlooks the fact that there is nothing to assure that descendants are willing to look after their relatives when they are no longer physically, mentally, or financially. Thus, it is vital to have legal commitments to guard both parties' interests. For instance, younger individuals have an obligation to their original caregivers. In contrast, some parents who never took after their kids should not be entitled to receive this care.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, it is apparent that old people are worthy of having a right to receive the support of their descendants when they become frail old or need financial assistance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | hien3112 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | thuthao2000 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | Dương Viết Phương Huyền | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | cupinsiuway | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Amanda Helen | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07920792079 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71153797947 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3271892331 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237237261349 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874772873483 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052987370172 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157790832156 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249439066744 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.