TPO61
The reading text and lecture are both about the how we can save the golgen grogs from the infection of the fungus. The author in regards to that provide the three different solutions, at the same time lrcturer disputes all these solutions and his position is that, all of these remedy is not effective to save the golden frog in area near the Panama river.
To begin with, the reading text suggests that, scientists has found one bacterium species, that produce the some kind of chemical which is the naturally control the growth of fungus on the skin of frogs. In contrast to that, lecturer said that, In early periods scientists has already done the experiments with bacteria and they found that, it is not an effective solution. On top of that, this bacteria produce that natural chemical only during their early colonization periods. After, make the big colony they stop they stop the production of it. To conclude, this bacteria only save the frog for the fraction of their lifetime.
Furthermore, reading passage claim that, if we breed the golden from in protect environment, away from the infected area then somehow we can get success in endanger the gold frogs. In contrary, professor believe that, this is not an effective solution of this problem. Because, If do breeding of frog in captivity. Then, other wild creature will carry this disease and spread out in the whole forest. As a result of that, when we return back that breed frog into the stream the problem become more severe tan what was in earlier period.
In last, the writer feels that, frog is having natural resistant mechanism in which it will heat up their body to protect themself from that fungus. On the other hand, tutor states that, heating up the body to save from the fungus is having a high draw back for the frogs themselves. Because, to heat up their body frogs require high amount of energy. If, the frogs will expanse of all its energy in the heating process. Then it will not able to distribute its energy for other function. So, it will become ill. which is more difficult for the frogs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Storyline | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | heartqq | 80 | view |
- TPO61 3
- Summarize the points made in lecture being sure to explain how they contradict specific points made in reading passage 73
- In 1939 an archaeological excavation in southeastern England revealed a grave dating to the seventh century CE The grave contained a 13 meter long ship filled with jewelry and other precious objects The presence of such impressive artifacts made it likely 3
- Some people thinks that we learn our most important lesson in school others think that the knowledge we acquire outside of the school is most important which view do you agree 60
- TPO58 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...reading text and lecture are both about the how we can save the golgen grogs from the i...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...the infection of the fungus. The author in regards to that provide the three different soluti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...one bacterium species, that produce the some kind of chemical which is the naturally...
^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uring their early colonization periods. After, make the big colony they stop they sto...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'they stop'.
Suggestion: they stop
...ion periods. After, make the big colony they stop they stop the production of it. To conclude, this...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...stop the production of it. To conclude, this bacteria only save the frog for the fra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...le forest. As a result of that, when we return back that breed frog into the stream the pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...igh draw back for the frogs themselves. Because, to heat up their body frogs require hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...dy frogs require high amount of energy. If, the frogs will expanse of all its ener...
^^
Line 7, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...other function. So, it will become ill. which is more difficult for the frogs.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, in contrast, kind of, as a result, in contrast to, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 365.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72054794521 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29853706932 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509589041096 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 2.5761589404 427% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6311703903 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6842105263 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327791814953 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100302876876 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632465191932 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190212568166 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451617017389 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.