TPO63
The reading text and lecture are both about the various benefits of the artificial reefs. While the author feels that man-made reef will facilitate the fisheries business and the fish itself. Lecturer disputes all these claims and said that artificial reef in ocean may cause serious problems.
To begin with, the reading text suggests that, artificial reefs will increase the fish population because, it will facilitate the fish for the better feeding and reproductive spots. In contrast to that, lecturer states that, main function of the coral reef is to attract the fish. In addition to that, if we are making too much artificial reef then it will increase the fish count in one specific area and improve the income of the fishermen. But, in the end it will loss the major population of the fish in the overall area.
Furthermore, the article posits that, establishment of the human made reef in sea is offer the economic competitive advantage for the small fishermen. In concern to that, professor goes to says that, unknown location of the artificial reef is serious danger for all the fishermen because, it will cause a safety problem for the fisherman like, sometimes it will destroy the fishing nets of them and on top of that, many time it will crashed the boat of the fisherman in shallow water.
In last, writer thinks that, making artificial reef is fascinated way to recycle an used material. Additionally, it is an inexpensive, eco-friendly way to reuse the used material. In contrary, orator notes down that, occasionally it causes harmful impact on the environments. Like, ash born reef, which is made up of the used motorbike’s tire. He notices that in some cases those ash born reef will spread out in the small fractions and releases the harmful chemical in the sea water. As a result of that, major sea flora and salt water habitual plant will be disturbed. So, this claim proves that putting artificial reef in the ocean, to get the high profit is not an eco-friendly way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 76 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | newtonloop | 3 | view |
| 2020-09-24 | Hashem Zahedipour | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...ishing nets of them and on top of that, many time it will crashed the boat of the fisherm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crash'
Suggestion: crash
...m and on top of that, many time it will crashed the boat of the fisherman in shallow wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 82, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...icial reef is fascinated way to recycle an used material. Additionally, it is an i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in some cases, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88856304985 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63078458087 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519061583578 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2654348335 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1875 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0370594993845 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0148058809832 0.0996497079465 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0126680901117 0.0662205650399 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0237703203728 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119783868058 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.