The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of weekly income was spent for various purposes by households in a country between 1968 and 2018.
Overall, it can be clearly seen from the chart that money for buying food outnumbered the others in 1968, while the percentage of weekly income spent on leisure took up most of the proportion in 2018.
In 1968, families used 35% of their weekly income for buying groceries, which took up the highest proportion, the figure then experienced a dip of 13% in 2018. As for the proportion of money spent every week on fuel, clothing and personal goods in 2018, there was also a drop of 3%, 5% and 4%, respectively. Furthermore, the percentage of weekly income used for household goods remained incredibly stable over a period shown.
Weekly spending on housing and leisure shared the similar percentage of money, around 10% each. Subsequently, the trend was reversed in 2018; the figure for leisure rose dramatically to 23%, which occupied the first place from that for food as well as the proportion of money spent on housing, which witnessed a rise of nearly 20%. Likewise, there was also a swift rise of approximately 15% in the percentage of weekly income used for transportation, which was half as many as the figure in 1968.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | andreahoangbp | 60 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 87
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, likewise, so, then, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87557603687 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75077767254 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6696457268 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170718359591 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943613258397 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575785448905 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138424004542 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496412533924 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.