The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The table and pie charts depict details anout police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain. The table illustrates the source of money while the charts show the distribution of budget.
Overall, all sources of financial distribution increased throughout the period. Most money was allocated on salaries of officiers and staff while only a few amount of money was spent on technology.
As can be seen from the table, in 2017. Government contribution accounted for 175,5 million pounds, which was the highest, whereas the figure for other sources was only 38 million pounds. In 2018, there has been a slight growth in the national government section and other sources section to 192,3 million pounds and38,5 pounds respectively. Meanwhile, police budget provison from local taxes went up significantly from 91,2 million pounds in the first year to 102,3 million pounds in 2018. The total money climbed sharply from 304,7 million pounds in 2017 to 318,6 million pounds in 2018.
Three out of four proportion of money was distributed to officiers and staff in 2017 but the figure decreased to just under 70%. Only 8% of financial budget was invested to technology in 2017, then grew sharply to 14% in the next year. The figure for building and transport remained unchange over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-09 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-12 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What are the changes which have occurred Do you think these changes are positive or negative 56
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think having a younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 100
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...ies of officiers and staff while only a few amount of money was spent on technology. As c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1086.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0511627907 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55997397229 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8416867546 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332870553168 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129599980099 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128486734744 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23126972582 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196256013741 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.