The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided in whether living in the cities addresses severe traffic and transportation problems in various locations around the world. While some argue that it seems to be the best way, I partly disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, it is true that traffic problems could be alleviated due to reducing indigenous people’s travelling for work at a certain extent. The more people live in cities, the less personal traffics would be used. Due to reducing the distance from their houses to the office, walking and public transportations may be a best choice. Additionally, not only does this phenomenom have positively influence on erasing traffic jamps, but it also lead to the overload of parking places and demetric noise pollution.
Beside the previously mentioned notions, encouraging local people lived in cities rather than suburbs or countryside seems to be impossible to tackle with this problem completely. First and foremost, the capacity of the cities is not enough for all the people living here, leading to individuals with the low income are not able to possess their own houses, which exacerbates the homeless conditions. Furthermore, there does not exist government’s strick laws in limiting traveler using their personal traffics. It results in congestion in controling the number of transportation in the cities to tackle such problems.
In conclusion, despite that gathering local people to live in cities exerts several advantages in solving traffic and transportation problems, I firmly believe that it shows significant drawbacks which are undeniable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-07 | viviannguyen | 56 | view |
- Some people think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to their society while others think people have more responsibilities as members of society than only paying taxes Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- Children nowadays watch TV programmes more than ever before Is watching television good or bad for children 78
- The charts below show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 years who took part in organised cultural activities and sport in Australia in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevan 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...lking and public transportations may be a best choice. Additionally, not only doe...
^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...ly does this phenomenom have positively influence on erasing traffic jamps, but it also l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...e on erasing traffic jamps, but it also lead to the overload of parking places and d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4297188755 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98432218981 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622489959839 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2706293241 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.909090909 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336652548219 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111954504779 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752069403712 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188807647671 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291967053795 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.