Some people think that schools should teach/enroll students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities/skills studying together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have differing views concerning the question of schools should group students according to their academic abilities or have students with different abilities studying together. Whilst some maintain that putting school students with similar abilities in group and teaching them together, I believe that a balanced between streaming and mixed-ability model approach can be the most effective.
There are numerous reasons why proponents of ability-based grouping argue, one of which is allowing teachers to tailor their instruction to the needs of each group. By grouping students of similar abilities together, teachers can provide more targeted and challenging instruction to high-achieving students, while also providing additional support and remediation to struggling students. This would therefore help maximize learning outcomes as students receive instruction that is appropriate for their current academic level. Another justification is that grouping by ability can create a sense of healthy competition among students, motivating them to strive for higher achievements. More specifically, in a tracking, the students were equally competent, they did not feel any lack of confidence, which would in turn they feel comfortable to express themselves and improve them.
Notwithstanding some critics’ objections, some people support the view that mixed-ability classrooms emphasize the importance of diversity and inclusion. They argue that by having students with different abilities studying together, it fosters a cooperative and supportive learning environment. In such classrooms, high-achieving students can serve as role models for their peers, while struggling students can benefit from peer tutoring and collaboration. This approach promotes empathy, social skills, and a sense of community among students. It should be also noted that mixed-ability classrooms prepare students for the real world, where they will inevitably encounter people with different abilities and backgrounds. Multiple-level classrooms are the real life-like environments that each student faces after going out into the real world.
In sum, while there are sensible reasons to believe that school should group students into classes depending on their levels of attainment, my view is that a balanced approach can be the most effective. a balanced approach that combines elements of both can provide the best learning outcomes. Should the school adjusts instruction to individual needs within a diverse classroom setting, students can benefit from the advantages of both approaches.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of the kiwi animal 56
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays a lot of companies switch to open offices Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 89
- The maps below show the planned to the town of Peterford in a 20 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where revelant At least 150 words 80
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 704, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... higher achievements. More specifically, in a tracking, the students were equally...
^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...ced approach can be the most effective. a balanced approach that combines element...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2210.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95687331536 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09451101641 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9687371399 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.125 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366371229851 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132041953409 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120865467028 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258774474528 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129999504941 0.056905535591 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.