Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now ‘one big traffic jams’.
How true do you think this statement is?
What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their car?
In contemporary the world, the issue of traffic jams caused by individuals having their own cars, and it has been rocketing rise over the past thirty years in numerous cities in the world. From my standpoint, traffic jams is thing inevitable then people may be less use car and this esay will explores within my explanation.
One of the reasons why traffic jams are happening in many cities in the world is because the population has been increasing and demand for cars rise by the population. For instance, if one of the family gave birth to numerous children then it is compulsory to buy a car to drive whole family members. Furthermore, some citizens who want to drive their family travel to some places far from the city central, so it is buy a car. Additionally, using cars can avoid rainy and sunny weather and it is useful for work. Besides, some cars have low cost then individuals can buy them, or demand on figure use cars then producer has been mass-produced car to meets their needs.
However, the tendency of traffic jams in cities is rising more and more rising quickly led to some bad consequences of environmental, so that governments may givesgive law to prevent from using cars. For example, it can be increased tariffs on imported cars, or governments encouraging citizens to use more public transport to go work or go a trip. Moreover, it should encourage citizens to use limited cars ownership to reduce pollution, save fossil fuel and ride bicycles to makes their bodies stronger.
In conclusion, the essay above explored cars ownership has risen so quickly over the three decades that many cities in the world are nowadays one big traffic jams. From my perspective, when I go some places near my home, I will use public transport, or go to walk if I can.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only subjects they find interesting and they are the best at Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- In many parts of the world some famous people are considered role models and they are having an increasing influence on the young Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only subjects they find interesting and they are the best at Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In the last decade there has been a great increase in the number and variety of online courses available to adults This has been welcomed as a great opportunity by many students however other students see these courses as less effective than classroom tea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'explore'
Suggestion: explore
... may be less use car and this esay will explores within my explanation. One of the reas...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77813504823 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68158720478 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530546623794 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.6661005383 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373403337744 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141010048633 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608253986474 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230682243295 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381864340304 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.