The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japa between 1980 and 2015
The line graph compares three different types of fish that a Japanese used in a week during a period of 35 years, commencing from 1980. Units are measured in grams
In general, there was an upward tendency in mackerel and salmon consumption, while the opposite was true to tuna. In addition, tuna predominated for the most given period except the last 12 years in which mackerel and tuna respectively replaced as the most favorite fish kind.
Although starting at different points in 1980, at 230 and 170, tuna and mackerel shared the same pattern in the next 10 years. The former and the latter reached a peak at 270 and 170 in 1985, after which both experienced a dramatic decrease by 30 between 1985 and 1990. Thereafter, there was an inverse proportion in these two kinds, the former continuously declined to 100 in the final year, with the most dramatic drop over the last 5 years while the latter soared considerably to approximately 200 at the end of the period.
Beginning at 70 in 1980, which was by far lower than the other two kinds, the amount of salmon eaten rose over threefold to nearly 250 in 2015 after stabilizing during the initial 25 years
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | M10 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | voidarchive | view | |
| 2023-01-24 | Zarifaaa | 72 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish in a city of Japan between 1980 and 2015 84
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity of Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67317073171 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56144478861 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60487804878 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.9109843865 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920378003324 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04391793299 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419258310125 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619013584931 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372985037674 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.