Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
The prevalence of the internet has dominated all aspects of life. People can even enjoy the masterpieces of famous artists worldwide without having to travel from one place to another. Therefore, some argue that museums and art galleries are no longer necessary and should be closed. From a personal perspective, the convenience technologies offer can never be comparable to the values museums and exhibition rooms bring about.
To a certain extent, the Internet has become an ideal option for those who lead a busy lifestyle and are on a budget while having a heated desire for art. With a smart device, art lovers are enabled to admire the beauty of art and get access to masterpieces and other artworks in the comfort of their own homes with just a click despite geographical distances. This also means that cultural tours become more cost-effective when tourists do not have to expense a great deal on air tickets and hotel rooms, which could be invested in other necessities. More importantly, there is completely no restriction on time and locations, hence, people can pay a virtual visit wherever and whenever they find convenient, not having to undergo complex procedures regarding reserving and queuing to get in. Thus, it could be said that the Internet has made our experience more convenient and economical.
Nevertheless, despite the merits the Internet offers, a real trip to historical museums and exhibitions is undoubtedly a valuable experience. Traveling is not simply observation but also inspiration. Having a closer look at artifacts, sculptures, paintings, and other ancient objects, not only can visitors enjoy the true values of art, sophisticated patterns, and designs, but they are also inspired by the works of renowned artists. In other words, their sense of national pride and patriotism may be evoked when they directly observe tools their ancients had used to survive. Additionally, museums can be considered an asset of the tourism industry. International tourists are usually attracted by the history and traditional customs of the nation they visit. Therefore, maintaining such historical architecture contributes significantly to the development of the local economy, improving inhabitants’ living standards.
All things considered, albeit economic and time benefits, it is advisable that museums and art galleries should be maintained.
- People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past Do you agree or disagree 86
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the international tourist arrivals in the top eight countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentage Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seums and exhibition rooms bring about. To a certain extent, the Internet has b...
^^^
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oms bring about. To a certain extent, the Internet has become an ideal option ...
^^
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mproving inhabitants’ living standards. All things considered, albeit economic a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41239892183 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05490143081 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611859838275 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5527421686 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.117647059 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8235294118 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225085957193 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619985640999 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048981931019 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137113518962 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222213744399 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.