The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010
The line graph compares four different areas regarding metric tonnes of carbon dioxide that a person released during a period of 35 years, commencing from 1975.
In general, there was an upward tendency in the amount of CO2 emitted in China, Thailand, and Vietnam, while the opposite was true to Singapore. In addition, Singapore predominated as the country had the highest level of CO2 during the period shown and Vietnam remained the lowest position over the same period.
Although sharing the same starting point at 0.5 in 1975, Vietnam stabilized over the first 20 years, then went up a little to approximately 2 in the final year, while Thailand experienced a considerable rise by 4 at the end of the period. Similarly, the level of carbon dioxide emissions in China commenced at around 1 in the initial year, followed by a significant growth to a high of 2 in 1995. Subsequently, this category saw a slight decrease in numbers and was surpassed by that of Thailand before reclaiming its second range and reaching over 5 in 2010.
On the other hand, a more volatile pattern was observed in Singapore's carbon dioxide production. Beginning at 11 in 1975, which was much higher than the other three countries, the level of CO2 released by Singapore fluctuated dramatically and reached a peak at 15 in 1975. Thereafter, it plummeted by half in 2005 and bounced back to its starting point in the last year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | Phạm Minh Hân | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tones from four sectors between 1990 and 2007 84
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 89
- The graph below shows carbon dioxide emissions per capita in four countries from 1975 to 2010 89
- Internet users as percentage of population 78
- The graph below shows the power generation capacity in Germany from 2008 to 2014 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, while, in addition, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84647302905 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80139843622 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2366456644 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.777777778 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164533643942 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065804941875 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695094416742 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107356417944 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769554285566 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.