The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart provides data demonstrating the proportion of people in four Asian nations who are residing in cities between a span of a seventy-year period. Overall, it can be seen that the figures from each country witnessed an upward trend through experiencing some fluctuations.
Malaysia and Indonesia were the two countries whose increase were the most significant. Despite starting as the country with the lowest in 2010 of residents in the cities, Indonesia climbed to second place in 2010 and stayed there since. Likewise, Malaysia, which started off at second, soared fiercely and remained in dominant position since 2000. Both countries' numbers were up by around 40% between 1970 and 2020, and the projections show that there would be another 10% increase in the 20 years to come.
The figures for Thailand and Philippines, despite not as rapid as the two aforementioned countries, were also on the rise. The percentage for Thailand grew by 12% from 1920 to 1990, but plateaued in the 30 years after. Figures for Philippines also increased sharply in the first 20 years recorded, but become the only country that saw a decline between 1990 and 2010. In spite of the fluctuations, predictions on the trend from 2020 to 204 are optimistic about further increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... second, soared fiercely and remained in dominant position since 2000. Both count...
^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n dominant position since 2000. Both countries numbers were up by around 40% between 1...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'number'.
Suggestion: number
...ant position since 2000. Both countries numbers were up by around 40% between 1970 and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons show that there would be another 10% increase in the 20 years to come. The...
^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to come. The figures for Thailand and Philippines, despite not as rapid as ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Thailand and Philippines, despite not as rapid as the two aforementioned count...
^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eaued in the 30 years after. Figures for Philippines also increased sharply in th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are optimistic about further increase.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, second, so, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80265504182 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638095238095 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.9649754656 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143227842362 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547086568577 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337366135442 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919813672363 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245958311232 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.