Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate.
What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages to this?
Thanks to the advance of worldwide communication technologies, international virtual encounters and interactions are no longer an exclusive advantage of the rich but a fundamental service available to all, including underprivileged people. However, this milestone in human history does have its drawbacks alongside its benefits.
On the one hand, several advantages brought about by international communication online have enhanced human development remarkably. Firstly, the deeper connections among people from around the world could stimulate global understanding and learning; thus alleviating misleading prejudices of one country about another and creating a harmonious international environment. For instance, before the advent of global Internet interaction, the negative and suspicious impression of Eastern people was not uncommon among Westerners; however, by communicating with Asians online, their perception of their Asian counterparts has been improved. Secondly, on a large scale, more intensive communications with foreigners would facilitate international collaborations, especially in terms of economy and politics. Through various online meetings made possible by the Internet, businessmen in one nation can connect hundreds of potential partners worldwide; creating profitable business opportunities without the need for expensive movements. More importantly, the latest communication technologies can enable governments to hold several conferences online, which gives them greater possibility to seek common goals for future associations.
On the other hand, there are some problems caused by infinitive virtual interactions such as unwanted social influences, severe global competition and threats to national security. To exemplify, being able to be in touch globally irrespective of geographical restrictions might help transmit detrimental or inappropriate ideologies among Internet users. For instance, DINKs, a modern lifestyle popularized by online connections, has contributed to the worryingly low birth rate in many Eastern countries such as China and Japan. Moreover, alongside greater business chances, fierce competition from the cooperation of multinational companies has threatened the development of local firms, which might reduce the economic independence of developing countries. Finally, given that international communication online led to an unprecedented rate of information-sharing, any nation with an obsolete Internet security system and inadequate related laws will have to face serious interventions of foreign organizations and governments. In recent decades, various information-leaking cases caused by international corporations like Facebook have made valuable data of their users, consisting of local authorities, be exploited for evil purposes.
In conclusion, although the possibility for almost all individuals to meet people from nations online has brought about enormous social, economic and political advantages; this development has also posed some visible threats to human prosperity.
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- The diagram shows a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
- The table below describes the percentages of home schooled students in Somecountry in 1999 2004 73
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population if four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e its drawbacks alongside its benefits. On the one hand, several advantages brou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...k common goals for future associations. On the other hand, there are some proble...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2646.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43795620438 5.12529762239 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51256132114 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 176.041082164 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639902676399 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 506.74238477 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.054889891 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.4 106.682146367 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261395989551 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794985922271 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523747205763 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13933686006 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515522650727 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.6 13.0946893788 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 1.77 50.2224549098 4% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.37 12.4159519038 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.51 8.58950901804 134% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 78.4519038076 217% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.